-
Denialist vs. Skeptic
-
Denialist vs. Skeptic: What's the difference? As usual, context is key: Those skeptical of established science are not skeptics, they are denialists. Science is skeptical by it's nature because science doubts opinions and science is not based on opinion or belief, it examines evidence and physics.
Located in
Projects & Resources
/
…
/
Global Warming
/
Myths vs. Facts: Global Warming
-
Ferenc Miskolcz
-
Even Dr. Roy Spencer, who is typically seen to be on the cool it side of the debate says Dr. Ferenc Miskolcz's claims are not supported by his work.
Located in
Projects & Resources
/
…
/
Global Warming
/
Myths vs. Facts: Global Warming
-
Hidden Code, Data, Raw Data
-
Global warming denialists claim 'the data is hidden' and 'scientists won't show the code so no one can verify what they are doing. This page has links to all the hidden data and code that has been available the entire time denialists have been claiming it is hidden.
Located in
Projects & Resources
/
…
/
Global Warming
/
Myths vs. Facts: Global Warming
-
S. Fred Singer
-
S. Fred Singer's early career includes a string of respected positions in the progress and advancement of science. Somewhere along the line, it seems something changed. His efforts apparently turned to advocacy of the agenda of the tobacco, and the fossil fuel industry. The latter part of his career seems to fall in the vein of what might be called a sort of serial denialism with respect to his positions on second hand smoke and human caused global warming.
Located in
Projects & Resources
/
…
/
Global Warming
/
Myths vs. Facts: Global Warming
-
Roger Pielke Sr.
-
Rebuttal to Dr. Pielke Sr. and his opinions pertaining to human caused global warming: Dr. Roger Pielke Sr. has published a number of respected papers during his scientific career. What is in question is not the body of his scientific work, but rather the lack of substance in his personal opinion. This raises important questions about what to believe when a scientist gives his biased opinion as opposed to what the body of evidence says.
Located in
Projects & Resources
/
…
/
Global Warming
/
Myths vs. Facts: Global Warming
-
Ross McKitrick - The McKi 'trick'
-
Rebuttal to Ross McKitrick, an economics professor sowing the seeds of doubt regarding human caused climate change and global warming? Much like John Coleman, McKitrick uses red herrings and appeals to your 'the living the good life' theme in order to say the climate scientists are wrong and that they can't really prove anything. Like others, he uses facts out of context to support his unsubstantiated opinions.
Located in
Projects & Resources
/
…
/
Global Warming
/
Myths vs. Facts: Global Warming
-
Glenn Beck
-
Rebuttal to Glenn Beck on Global Warming: A common problem with media personalities is actually multifaceted. They tend to market to their base and they tend to not understand the science and confuse the issue. This results in a battle of science vs. rhetoric. Glenn Beck is an excellent example and exhibits the problem well. Unfortunately, in the media, he is not alone.
Located in
Projects & Resources
/
…
/
Global Warming
/
Myths vs. Facts: Global Warming
-
The Denial Machine
-
"The Denial Machine" was produced in 2006 but the denial machine behind the efforts to confuse the issue of human caused global warming started long before that. It's seeds were planted as far back as 1957 when Dr. Roger Revelle from Scripps Institute of Oceanography produced substantial work showing the implications and increased CO2 in the atmosphere. As the 'Keeling Curve' went up, the denial machine grew larger and more manipulative, and still continues today.
Located in
Projects & Resources
/
…
/
Global Warming
/
Myths vs. Facts: Global Warming
-
The Great Global Warming Swindle
-
The Martin Durkin Film, 'The Great Global Warming Swindle', made so many mistakes that after the film was released, the filmmaker was forced to reedit the film. In that process, he removed some of the most blatant mistakes that he had made, but left in some other claims that were also entirely wrong.
Located in
Projects & Resources
/
…
/
Global Warming
/
Myths vs. Facts: Global Warming
-
Henrik Svensmark
-
Rebuttal to Svensmark assertions: Svensmark has received a fair amount of attention in the denialist world. But why? He says he is being ignored. But Why? Is it because there is a great conspiracy of scientists trying to hide the truth about galactic cosmic rays? Or is that that Svensmarks conclusions were not supported by the work presented? As it turns out, his conclusions were not sufficiently supported.
Located in
Projects & Resources
/
…
/
Global Warming
/
Myths vs. Facts: Global Warming
